Is this argument inductive or deductive? What fallacy is it committing?

Question by : Is this argument inductive or deductive? What fallacy is it committing?
“Theyclaim that the Illinois Department of Corrections’ drug treatment program at Sheridan penitentiary discharged inmates who were “40 percent less likely to be arrested a year later and 85 percent less likely to return to prison.” This statistic stating incredible success indicates the data should be re-checked because it is probably false, or it misinterprets the rate of recidivism from the treatment program.

A drug treatment venue claiming a rate of success approaching 85 percent for criminals with chronic addiction issues would be the world’s best program, and it seems way too good to be true.

Another issue that merits clarification is the failure to fully analyze the statistic regarding prisoners convicted for drug cases. Many of these criminals are guilty of illicit activities above and beyond punishing people for using illegal drugs. Virtually no one goes to prison for a simple felony possession of drugs unless they have a long track record of violating probation, evading the readily available treatment programs or have a multitude of arrest issues in their background.”

PLEASE HELP! I need to understand this in order to help me study for an upcoming exam.

Best answer:

Answer by ? Brian ?
It is an inductive argument because it is based upon human experience and probability. As opposed to deductive, where the conclusion would have to necessarily follow from the premises, logically.

Answer by Ardi Pithecus ™
It is DEductive, because induction is derived from direct experience to direct conclusion. Example; you are outside; you feel the heat of the sun; you conclude “The sun is out”. Induction is simply “this from that” reasoning, whereas deduction goes through the motions of thinking things through; but if not thought through by the rules of valid deductive logic, then you get an invalid conclusion, which is called a fallacy.

The fallacy lies in the first two words, “They claim”. This is the fallacy of Appeal to Anonymous Authority. The speaker accepts “them” without proof of who they are.
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#they_say

The second fallacy is accepting that what they say is actually what the Illinois Department of Corrections’ drug treatment program at Sheridan penitentiary said. But that is unimportant because there are other fallacies, too, and it is the very first one that denies the validity of the argument.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

 

Area pastors lobby for lower prison population, more treatment

Filed under: drug treatment programs in prison

It promotes outside treatment programs for lower level offenders in hopes of cutting current state prison population of about 22000, down to 11000 by 2015. Michael Gumulauskas of Eau Claire spent more than six years in jails and prisons for drug and …
Read more on WEAU-TV 13

 

Prison officers' gobsmacking response on needle program

Filed under: drug treatment programs in prison

Perhaps prison officers may never succeed in this task. So another solution might be to treat the drug-addicted with health solutions before they come to the notice of law enforcement. The result? Fewer prisoners, better use of public funds, and for us …
Read more on The Canberra Times

 

Texas prison population shrinks as rehabilitation programs take root

Filed under: drug treatment programs in prison

So-called "specialty" courts in Austin, Dallas, Houston and other cities now custom-tailor treatment programs for drug offenders, drunk drivers, veterans and prostitutes to push them to turn their lives around without going to prison. ? Parole …
Read more on Austin American-Statesman

 

'Mob Wives' son AJ Donofrio headed to rehab not jail

Filed under: drug treatment programs in prison

Treatment programs are better aimed at people with little support and low-level charges — not those with financial means who participated in a drug-selling operation, assistant district attorney Jonathan Laskin said. "These people should go to jail …
Read more on New York Daily News